ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2017 | Volume
: 3
| Issue : 2 | Page : 102-106 |
|
Perspectives on poster as a presentation mode in conferences
Himel Mondal1, Shaikat Mondal2
1 Department of Physiology, MKCG Medical College, Ganjam, Odisha, India 2 Department of Physiology, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Himel Mondal Department of Physiology, MKCG Medical College, Ganjam, Odisha India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_58_17
|
|
Background: Research knowledge is dispersed among peers commonly via three modes of presentation in conferences – workshop, oral presentation, and poster presentation. Each mode of presentation has certain advantages and disadvantages.
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore medical professionals' perspectives on advantages and disadvantages of poster presentation in scientific conferences.
Materials and Methods: A pretested questionnaire was used as the survey instrument. The instrument was composed of eight statements with 5-point Likert-type response option. A cross-sectional, online survey (on Google Forms) was conducted among medical professionals who participated in conferences where posters were presented for research presentation. Responses were expressed in percentages and compared by Chi-square test with α = 0.05.
Results: Survey response rate was 29.06% ([247/850] × 100). The best feature of poster presentation was the option to re-read the paper (98.78%) followed by the facility of face-to-face interaction with authors (95.15%) and facility to read the paper of interest only (93.12%). Highest equivocal opinion was received (42.92%) for applicability of poster in presentation of in-depth information about the research.
Conclusion: This study revealed that preference of poster presentation is mostly due to facility of reading the paper of interest only and option to re-read according to necessity. Face-to-face interaction with researcher was another major advantage of poster as a presentation medium. Hence, an option for presenting oral papers as posters, presented by a coauthor, may be considered for wide dispersion of research knowledge. |
|
|
|
[FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|